Archive for the ‘SMS Marketing’ Category

Company sign for SAPGerman software giant SAP is set to buy a rival, California-based Sybase, giving it a boost in its ongoing rivalry with Oracle Corp.

The Sybase board has rubber-stamped the deal, valued at $5.8 billion (4.6 billion euros), but the approval of SAP shareholders and regulators is still required.

SAP is offering $65 a share for Sybase – a nearly 16 percent premium on Wednesday’s closing price. The all-cash offer is being made by SAP’s US unit, SAP America. SAP said it would fund the purchase with cash on hand and a 2.75-billion-euro loan facility from Barclays Capital and Deutsche Bank.

Focus on mobile market

SAP is the world’s biggest maker of programs for managing business tasks such as accounting. Sybase is the fourth-largest provider of database software. The acquisition will give SAP a high-performance database along with programs that companies use to deliver corporate software to mobile devices. Sybase is also one of the world’s biggest processors of mobile text messages.

Chinese women using a cell phone

The deal represents SAP’s largest purchase since it bought Business Object of France in 2007, for 4.8 billion euros. News of the acquisition sent Sybase shares soaring.

SAP expects the acquisition to give it a better placement in its mobile-devices business and therefore help it gain ground against rival Oracle, which currently has a strong advantage in the sector.

Match made with ‘magic’

“SAP will accelerate the reach of its solutions across mobile platforms,” SAP said in a statement explaining its move. “Sybase’s innovative mobile platform can connect all applications and data and enable them on mobile devices.”

And SAP Co-Chief Executive Bill McDermott said in a conference call with Germany’s DPA press agency: “We don’t need to cut costs to make it work. That’s the magic.”

“We see a huge emerging market for real-time mobile devices,” McDermott said, predicting that the mobile Internet would grow to 10 times the size of the desktop Internet.

jen/AFP/dpa/Reuters
Editor: Nancy Isenson

URL Link:

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5568714,00.html

My Comments on the below article:

M-commerce is a natural progression for retailers to extend their existing e-commerce operations.  I also have the viewpoint that m-commerce will leapfrog e-commerce in less established markets. After all mobile internet has done this in countries like India, China, Korea (to name a few) so why not m-commerce? Retailers have been traditionally slow in taking up mobile as a marketing/sales channel.  It was no different in the early fixed internet days. However, with players like Google and Apple moving into the market, I do believe Retailers are being forced to wake up and realise the true potential of this device.  Whilst they are behind other sectors in mobile adoption, it is not too late for them to get involved.

Unfortunately, we have already seen retailers start to embrace mobile with the wrong strategy and are making the mistakes that others are savvy too. We are seeing retailers jump on the app bandwagon without considering the mobile internet first, this is a classic mistake to make.

Mobile Internet is at the heart of Mobile Marketing campaigns. The key to this is to remember mobile works best when integrated into traditional media whatever the format.  Mobile applications are just one element to utilise as a marketing channel. At present only iphone applications are offering the rich levels brands would expect and the experience consumers would hope for. The others are some way behind.  There is limited reach, as in the UK iphone has only **17% handset penetration (much less Globally) with Blackberry slightly higher on **20% and Nokia still dominating with a huge **39%  (**Smart phone penetration).

In order to maximise the success of any campaign you need to reach the targeted masses; which means you need to consider all platforms and formats whether it is an application, mobile internet site or simple SMS communications or mobile vouchers (to name but a few). This always comes back to the key metrics in determining the success of any campaign:

Reach, Targeting, Engagement, Viral-ability and Transactional…..

Does it have reach?  Is it targeted? Is it engaging?  Is it viral? Can you make a sale?

The higher it scores in these areas then the closer you are to running a successful mobile marketing campaign that has delivered recognised measured tangible results.

The iPhone apps and other apps can be an added benefit to a customer base and must be considered.  Starting with the mobile internet will enable reach of a much wider audience and they can run trageted ad campaigns on mobile internet sites which will produce much better ROI than simply trying to drive traffic to download their iPhone app (which is not measurable and excluding to the masses if  integrated into traditional media). Only recently I published a press release on my blog from the IAB who conducted research with Nationwide showing  that using mobile and online advertising in combination can significantly increase brand awareness and purchase consideration:

http://wp.me/pxxzu-6R

I have been working in mobile with some of the worlds leading brands since early 2003 across many sectors.  Mobile is a powerful communications channel whether it is engendering loyalty, acquiring customers or retaining customers. It delivers in all these areas across all mobile formats.

Tweet this

Posted By, 26 February 2010 10:30am, Graham Charlton @ Econsultancy

One trend I’ve noticed lately is that the few UK retailers that have launched mobile commerce services have opted to do this via mobile apps rather than a mobile website. Both Next and Net-A-Porter have the app, but not the mobile site.

Is there an argument for producing an app rather than a mobile site? Or should retailers be looking to reach as many customers as possible with a mobile site? Or should they have both?

I’ve listed some of the arguments for and against…

Why have a mobile commerce app?

Since smartphones, and the iPhone in particular, currently dominate the mobile internet, there is an argument that an app is more likely to appeal to them.

Smartphone users are more affluent. Therefore, apps will appeal to an audience with more disposable income.

Better functionality. Smartphone features like GPS and the compass on the 3GS means that retailers can offer a richer experience, with location based services, augmented reality, or the photo function on the Amazon iPhone app.

Greater visibility. The popularity of App Store as a model for distributing apps means that retailers can get some good exposure for their apps. For example, the recently releasedNext iPhone app currently sits at number two in the Top 25 free apps list, which should guarantee plenty of downloads.

Your customers have smartphones. If you have a significant proportion of mobile visitors using Android phones and iPhones, then an app may be the best way to appeal to them.

Why have an m-commerce website?

Greater reach. An app restricts the number of customers you can appeal to.

Appeal to mobile searchers. Apps need to be downloaded in advance. If customers don’t have your app, they can’t buy from you, but if you have a mobile-optimised site, they can search and find it on their browsers.

No third party approval required. If you want an app, you’ll need to wait for approval before release and before you make adjustments. Having a mobile site means you are unrestrained in your site design and can push out updates and changes whenever you want.

No need to design multiple apps. Eventually other phones will eat into iPhone market share more and more, meaning that you may have to develop apps for several handsets. You can avoid this with a mobile site.

The browser-based mobile market is the future. According to recent Taptu research, the browser-based mobile web market will grow much faster than the app market, so a mobile site will be necessary long term.

—-

For a retailer looking for the largest possible audience for its products and services, the best starting point may be a website optimised for all mobiles, as this allows you to reach the widest possible audience. You allow people to stumble upon your site via a mobile search engine.

If a healthy percentage of visitors to your mobile site are using iPhones, Android Handsets or others, then there is a case for developing a dedicated mobile app to improve the experience for these customers.

Or, to cover all bases, why not have a mobile site AND app? This is what eBay, Amazon, Best Buy and others all do, and it seems to be working for them.

URL Link:

http://econsultancy.com/blog/5481-mobile-commerce-should-you-have-a-site-or-an-app#blog_comment_22997

Posted By, by Laurie Sullivan, Friday 8th Jan, 5:26 PM

Tweet this

Google has been testing the inclusion of click-to-call phone numbers in search ads on high-end mobile phones, a spokesperson confirmed. It’s a feature that fits in nicely with Nexus One, Google’s mobile phone announced earlier this week.

In anticipation of rolling out the feature more broadly, Google contacted several AdWords advertisers to advise them that it plans to extend the feature to their AdWords accounts. It’s similar to a cost-per-call service where the advertiser is charged for the click to call the same way you might get charged for clicks from an ad to a Web site.

When MediaPost asked Google late last month about displaying phone numbers in ads and charging advertisers when calls are initiated, the Mountain View, Calif. search engine had nothing to report. Now the company says it will have more details when the feature is finally rolled out.

Google had few words to say about mobile search, advertising or business models during the Nexus One press conference earlier this week. That’s when it announced the phone. But as Google, Yahoo and Microsoft make investments and push harder into mobile, many industry experts believe local businesses could have the most to gain through online search and display mobile advertising.

The intersection of local and mobile creates two distinct and huge ad opportunities, especially for small businesses, according to Kevin Lee, chief executive officer at Didit, New York. “National advertisers with regional footprints will certainly need to spend on mobile,” he says. “Plus, there are millions of small businesses who would love to grow but need something other than search engine advertising.”

Andrew Shotland, owner of Local SEO Guide, a SEO in Pleasanton, Calif., has a different perspective on the topic. He says if Nexus One is the “on ramp” for more people to get into mobile search, then you will see opportunities for small businesses in mobile advertising, but he doesn’t believe Google’s phone does anything out of the ordinary that any smartphone can do.

On second thought, Shotland says, “the voice search is pretty killer and it’s a key step in the evolution of mobile search, but I don’t think it’s specific to local.”

Using search engines to comparison shop has become a major service offered by Microsoft’s Bing for mobile. The huge opportunity for retailers resides in a search query that ties eventually to a sale, whether through a browser or application through an mcommerce-enabled mobile site, or being driven into the store and finding it stocked on the aisle.

Speaking with MediaPost on Wednesday, Jamie Wells, director of global trade marketing for the Mobile Media group at Microsoft, says it’s the next opportunity and the next hot area for search. “If you look at the classic purchase funnel, this really is the last mile,” he says. “You invest all this money in television, outdoor and radio to drive awareness — the last thing you want to do is allow a competitor to swoop in and undercut all that investment. You want to make sure to complete the sale. That’s what mobile search will do.”

Many functions related to mobile search have been available, but Yahoo, Microsoft and Google are beginning to see a rise in use. Increased search activity, competitive pricing for mobile advertising between search engines, and qwerty keyboards in more mobile phones allow for longer search queries. Google’s recently announced voice search technology should help boost efforts, too.

The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) estimates that wireless handsets, which contribute more than 30% of total wireless phone shipments, will become the primary driver for revenue this year for electronics. Smartphones should lead the way, generating nearly $17 billion in shipment revenue and more than 52 million unit sales in 2010, according to the CEA.

That push requires more support through agencies for companies of all sizes. Agencies have typically been shy when it comes to investing in people like Patrick Moorhead, who moved to Draftcb from Razorfish last year to become vice president and director of mobile platforms.

Moorhead’s charter at Draftcb is to help the agency realize investments in technology and strategy, and educate all aspects of company divisions, from media planning to creative services. It also means helping clients understand they can’t — and should not — ignore search and display mobile advertising, especially small companies.

A mobile campaign and strategy can put small companies on a more even footing with larger competitors. He says advertisers need to step up and create a strategy, and stop thinking they can just test mobile in a six-week campaign to see what happens. “Creating an iPhone app and calling it a mobile strategy just isn’t enough,” Moorhead says.

The barriers have been dropping to enable all the “dream” devices that consumers have been speculating about for years. For example, there has been time to add mobile into the marketing mix and invest in the basic infrastructure to support SMS messaging as a component of CRM, Moorhead says, but they haven’t taken it seriously. Now it’s time.

URL Link to Mediapost:

http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=120265