Posts Tagged ‘IAB’

Posted By }  guardian.co.uk,

The explosion in the popularity of smartphones and tablets has led to mobile advertising revenues nearing £500m in 2012. Photograph: Lee Jae-Won/Reuters

The explosion in popularity of smartphones, tablets and the app revolution has fuelled a more than doubling in mobile advertising to £500m this year – just four years after the sector struggled to attract £25m.

UK mobile advertising grew a staggering 132% in the first six months of this year to £181.5m, according to the latest Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) report conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Breakneck growth is continuing in the second half – fuelled by the popularity of Apple and Google’s app stores as smartphone ownership nears 60% of the UK’s adult population – with forecasts putting UK mobile spend at as much as £511m for the full year.

In 2011, the IAB put mobile ad spend at £203m.

Mobile display and video advertising almost doubled in the first six months this year to £50m, with mobile search soaring by more than 150% to £132m.

Mobile search accounts for almost three-quarters of all UK mobile ad spend.

Total UK internet advertising spend rose 12.6% year on year in the first six months to £2.59bn, comfortably on track to pass £5bn for the year. The total digital display advertising market, including mobile, rose 10.6% in the first half to £591m.

One of the biggest beneficiaries of the rise of digital display advertising, albeit not on mobile, has been Facebook. Enders Analysis puts Facebook UK’s full-year ad revenues at £236m, a healthy 35% year-on-year rise.

However, these figures actually represent a cut of 18% on more bullish estimates made earlier in the year.

Enders analyst Ian Maude said the downgrade is the result of factors including a steeper-than-expected slowdown in the rate of Facebook’s ad revenue growth, marketers reassessing the value of ploughing money into gathering friends and likes to brand pages, and the social networking site’s well-documented struggle to make money out of mobile.

Jamie Matthews, chief executive of Initials Marketing, believes the scope for growth for mobile marketing remains massive.

“The £500m mark is just the start,” he says. “Facebook is racing to develop a mobile ad strategy to tap into its 550 million monthly mobile users, and more than half of big companies do not yet have a coherent mobile marketing strategy. I would expect mobile advertising to continue to grow at a staggering rate for some years yet.”

The biggest segment of the internet advertising market continues to be paid-for searches, which are dominated by Google.

Spend on search advertising rose 16% in the first half to crack £1.5bn, a 60% share of the overall market.

The rise of mobile ad spend in the UK

2008: £25.45m

2009: £37.6m, up 32% year on year

2010: £83m, up 116% year on year

2011: £203m, up 157% year on year

2012: £181.5m in the first half, up 132% year on year.

Via: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/oct/09/mobile-advertising-500-million-pounds-2012?newsfeed=true

Posted By ] James Robinson

Expensively produced adverts that were once only seen in glossy magazines are now being produced for many tablets and smartphones. Photograph: Jim Wilson/New York Times/Redux/eyevine

Mobile advertising is finally beginning to come of age as phones transform the relationship brands have with their customers in new, and sometimes unexpected, ways. The rate of growth is astounding, and the pace of change so rapid it is now difficult to believe that many companies greeted the predicted inexorable growth of mobile advertising with barely disguised scepticism a decade or so ago.

The UK market was worth £83m in 2010, according to the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB), up from £37.6m the previous year, an 116% like-for-like increase. Online market research company comScore says that in 2010 there were 19.1 million monthly mobile internet users in this country, up by 4.6 million from the same month the previous year. US investment bank Morgan Stanley said this year that “online advertising may finally be entering a golden age”.

The bank believes that the mobile advertising market in western countries is set to reach the recent growth rates seen in Japan, where mobile ad spend rose threefold from 2006 to 2009, to stand at $1bn (£610m). FirstPartner, a consultancy company, predicts that the UK market will be valued at £992m by 2015.

Much of that growth has been driven by the mobile internet and, latterly, by smartphones. Jon Mew, head of mobile at the IAB, points out that 41% of the population already have a smartphone. “By next year that should be half of the population,” he says, “and it shows no sign of slowing.”

Rik Haslam, chief creative officer at leading digital advertising agency RAPP, says: “Clients sometimes ask me whether mobile advertising is really something they should focus on. I tell them that right now more smartphones are being built than laptops and desktops combined, that mobile internet use is ramping up almost 300% faster than desktop internet access did, and that more than 50% of people use a mobile device while watching TV. So yes, it’s something clients should focus on.” He adds: “If the internet revolution disrupted business norms, then the smartphone revolution is devastating business norms.”

Analysts at Morgan Stanley estimate that by 2020 there will be about 10bn mobile internet devices worldwide – 10 times the number of PCs currently in use.

But the story can’t be told by statistics alone, as compelling as they are. The arrival of tablets, Apple’s iPad in particular, and the popularity of location-based services, which use the GPS functionality of a smartphone to offer users services based on their location, have transformed the user experience – and the aesthetics – of mobile advertising. Put simply: it has become sexy.

“Traditional brands didn’t do much on mobile, but it’s changed dramatically in the last year,” says Mew.

In recent years, around two thirds of online advertising spend has traditionally been on ringtones and downloads, but 12% of spend last year came from companies that sell fast-moving consumer goods.

The look, feel and size, of the iPad, one of the fastest-selling new computer devices in history (it took just one month to sell 1m iPads; the iPhone reached the same target in 74 days), has prompted fashion brands and car companies to create sumptuous online campaigns that were only seen in glossy magazines or expensive television adverts until recently.

Generating a response

Although they have been talked about for some time, location-based services have only really started to take off over the past 12 months, aided by the launch of Google and Facebook products, such as Facebook Places. Those services are powerful, allowing carefully targeted advertising campaigns that generate far better responses among consumers. Research published by location data firm Navteq in August 2010 found that 41% of consumers who saw a specific mobile advert went into one of that retailer’s stores – and 53% said it was the advert that prompted them to visit.

Text messaging and advertising campaigns have become more targeted and more sophisticated. More people are using their phones rather than PCs to search the internet (10% of all UK traffic now comes through mobiles) and new mobile technology is enabling big corporations to experiment with reward schemes designed to attract and retain customers, which may, ultimately, make loyalty cards obsolete. M-commerce also continues to grow: mobile-generated sales at online giant eBay tripled to nearly $2bn in 2010, with the UK the fastest adopter.

Challenges remain for advertisers, however. The lure of the iPad and the iPhone, with their hugely popular apps, can make companies who want to establish a mobile advertising presence lazy. According to mobile marketing company 2ergo: “A lot of companies launch a mobile app and think they’ve ticked the mobile box – but an iPhone is only 11% of the total [mobile] market. You’re missing out on the bulk of your target audience.”

If a company wants to reach all of its target audience, it has to create content that can be used on all of the popular operating systems, which combined make up the vast majority of the market. Google’s operating system for mobiles, Android, is growing market share, and Android-powered phones recently overtook iPhone sales. BlackBerry-maker RIM has won a new audience of young enthusiasts who use its instant- messaging service.

All of those platforms are likely to enlarge, but there are lingering concerns among consumers about privacy and there is still some resistance about using services such as mobile internet at all. According to a recent IAB survey, 21% of respondents said they only used their mobile phone for texting or calling. That seems set to change, however, as mobile phones become the next link in the internet’s evolutionary chain. There have been several false dawns, most notably when WAP-enabled phones, which allowed users mobile access to the internet for the first time, became available at the end of the last century and failed to live up to the hype that surrounded their launch. This time around, the hyperbole seems justified.

Via: http://www.guardian.co.uk/mobile-marketing-2011/mobile-advertising-profit-fingertips

Image representing Eric Schmidt as depicted in...

Image via CrunchBase

Posted By ] Anna Maria Virzi

Palm Springs, CA Mobile is taking off faster than predicted, said Google CEO Eric Schmidt. And Google, which develops the Android operating system for smartphones, has seen mobile usage soar in all sorts of activities.

As keynote speaker at the Interactive Advertising Bureau‘s annual leadership meeting, Schmidt offered up these facts:

- Mobile searches related to Chrysler, a Super Bowl advertiser, were 102 times higher after the ad was televised; desktop searches for Chrysler increased only 48 times more than usual.

- For GoDaddy.com, another Super Bowl advertiser, searches for the brand were 315 times higher than usual. In contrast, desktop searches were only 38 times higher.

- There are more than 200 million YouTube mobile playbacks per day.

- 78 percent of smartphone users shop on their device.

“This is the future and everyone will adapt,” said Schmidt, who is stepping down as Google’s CEO in April after a 10-year stint.

In a sign that Google continues to make a big push into mobile, it hosted a half-day event, ThinkMobile, in New York earlier this month for advertisers and agencies. They discussed the potential of the mobile platform, including mobile advertising.

At the IAB meeting, Schmidt predicted that digital display advertising could grow to $200 billion a year, up from about $9 billion in the United States and $20 billion worldwide.

Improvements in ad technology will help make that happen, he said. Google has acquired ad technology companies including display ad platform DoubleClick in 2008, mobile ad platform AdMob in 2009, and Invite Media, a demand-side platform, in 2010.

“It’s still too complicated to get a campaign up. It’s just too hard,” he said. As ad operations become more automated, he said, they will become more efficient and ads will have greater reach. “We have to give advertisers, publishers, and consumers more choice and control. As technology matures, we’ll be able to do this,” he said.

Schmidt did not discuss how Google is trying to thwart companies, such as JC Penney and Overstock from using black hat tactics to improve their rankings in search results.

In other highlights:

- The IAB established a six-month deadline for its members to comply with a code of conduct that had been adopted last year. New members will be required to comply with the code within three months of joining.

- IAB members roasted Randall Rothenberg who returns as CEO after a one-month stint as Time Inc. chief digital officer.

- And today, the IAB will announce new ad units that are the winners of its “rising stars” competition. IAB Chief Marketing Officer David Doty, in an interview last week, said the competition is aimed at encouraging greater creativity in interactive advertising.

Via: http://www.clickz.com/clickz/news/2029405/google-ceo-mobile-growing-faster-predicted

NEW RESEARCH SHOWS THAT CONSUMERS ARE MOVING FASTER THAN RETAILERS TOWARDS MOBILE INTERNET

Survey commissioned by AIME, IAB and IMRG shows that 41% of UK retail brands expect to have a transactional mobile site or application within the next year

Too few retailers have a solid mobile presence today, however, 41% plan to have a transactional mobile site or application in place within the next year, according to the results from a new research partnership between the Association for Interactive Media and Entertainment (AIME), the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) and the Interactive Media in Retail Group (IMRG).  The study found that while mobile commerce is still very much at the consideration stage, the majority of retailers surveyed expect mobile commerce to be part of their main strategy within the next 12 months.

eDigital Research, commissioned by AIME, the IAB and the IMRG surveyed 140 marketing professionals from the retail sector in the UK to understand attitudes, behaviours and perceived challenges to mobile commerce.  Over half (59%) of the senior-level representatives from UK retail brands that took part expected their mobile revenues to increase over the next 12 months, and 94% saw it as a real opportunity for their business.

More retailers need to follow their audiences on mobile

The research highlights the need for retailers to move faster to keep with the consumers already seeking out retail websites via their mobile phones. Each month in the UK, a staggering 4.2 million consumers are visiting retailers’ websites using the mobile internet (GSMA and comScore, 2010).

However, just four out of the top 20 most frequently visited retailer websites are presently optimised for mobile, and only eight of the top 20 have any kind of mobile application for smartphones like the iPhone, Blackberry or Android powered devices. This means that many retailers could be missing out on additional revenues from the ready and willing mobile consumer traffic to their sites.

In response to the research, Sienne Veit, Social and Mobile Commerce Development Manager at M&S Direct said: “Mobile internet sits at the heart of many of our customer’s lives, and we’ve invested significant resource to ensuring that their mobile experience is as straightforward and rewarding as possible. This research from AIME, the IAB and IMRG highlights how emerging mobile media looks set to play a much stronger role in UK commerce, and for us as retailers it’s been essential to establish a solid mobile presence to fully complement the evolving customer journey.”

Whilst most retailers believe their mobile revenues will increase over the next few years, currently around 63% either make less than 1% of their total revenues via mobile, or don’t measure their mobile revenues at all at present, citing a lack of knowledge and expertise about the mobile platform. However, the research found that over half (59%) of the senior-level representatives from UK retail brands that took part in the survey, expected their mobile revenues to increase over the next 12 months, and 94% saw it as a real opportunity for their business.

More mobile training needed

The majority of UK retail brands welcomed the opportunity for further training in mobile commerce and advertising, recognising the increasing part the medium will play in the customer journey – 74% of those respondents stated that they would like to receive training in this area. Currently 1 in 10 retail marketers cites themselves as a ‘mobile expert’, while 43% believe they have a basic knowledge of the medium.

In the coming months, the AIME, IAB and IMRG will be holding a series of events around mobile commerce, as well as producing educational materials for retail brands and conducting further research into the behaviours and attitudes of UK consumers in this area.

Edward Boddington, Chairman of AIME and CEO of Harvest Media, commented: “The results of this survey commissioned by these three leading trade associations clearly demonstrates the opportunity for M-Commerce to develop rapidly over the next 24 months from a £500m industry today. Increasingly, consumers are looking for best deals, especially in a tough economy and mobile represents the most convenient tool for instant redemption in the form of coupons and also loyalty clubs.”

Alex Kozloff, mobile manager for the Internet Advertising Bureau said: “For brands, extending their presence onto mobile has been a daunting prospect, simply due to the new jargon, technologies and tricks of the trade that need to be understood in order to make the most of the medium.  But with UK consumers already seeking out brands on their mobile phones, in particular retailers, it really is essential that marketers ensure the mobile experience they offer is just as useful, usable and engaging as their other properties, both on and offline. If they don’t, those competitors who have already put mobile on the agenda may start to steal their otherwise loyal customers.”

Andrew McClelland, Director of Operations at IMRG said: “Consumers are once again driving demand for a new, convenient shopping channel, just as they did in the early days of online retailing. This time around, the cultural shift required for retailers to recognise this demand is much smaller and in many cases requires the optimisation of an existing web presence rather than a ‘ground-up’ development of a new technology. However, there is a thirst for knowledge with in the retail sector to best understand how a mobile channel fits with their customer proposition.”

Steve Ricketts, Head of Mobile Marketing and mCommerce Services, Orange said:”Retailers know that there is a huge audience wanting to engage with them via mobile and the mCommerce opportunity is there for the taking. It’s great that just under half of respondents intend to provide customers with the opportunity to purchase via their mobile in the next 12 months - what the others need to ask themselves if they’re happy letting their competitors steal the march.

Tom Sondej of eDigitalResearch said: “The research shows that retailers are all aware of boundless opportunities that mobile commerce holds such as increased revenues, identification of niche markets and a possibility to target ‘low incidence rate’ groups with different marketing mix campaigns. However mobile operating platforms must be fully optimised for the retail marketplace to take the full advantage of M-commerce and the research reveals that many retailers are still lagging behind in terms of developing their M-commerce offer. Good news is that more retailers anticipate M commerce to become a part of their main strategy in the near future.”

- ENDS -

For further information or comment please contact:

Andrew Darling

Communications Director, AIME

Tel: +447968 166407

andrew@aimelink.org

Amy Kean

Senior PR and marketing manager, IAB

Tel: +447739 372042

amy@iabuk.net

About the AIME

AIME (www.aimelink.org) is a UK based membership organisation representing and promoting the commercial interests of the interactive media and entertainment industry – where customers use their phones, televisions or computers to access, interact and pay for information, marketing or entertainment services using leading edge micropayment technology.

AIME’s membership represents the entire value chain – from the providers of end user content to the networks and technical services that deliver and bill them to customers. No other organisation can offer such opportunities for profitable contacts, networking and supporting information. By setting industry best practice standards, AIME builds solid and lasting relationships with legislators, regulators and stakeholders to ensure our members’ business is professionally represented and given every opportunity to grow.

About the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB)

The Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) is the trade association for digital advertising. With around 500 member companies, it’s run for the leading media owners and agencies in the UK internet industry. Online is an exciting and fast-growing medium and our job at the IAB is to work with members to ensure marketers can identify the best role for online and mobile, helping them engage their customers and build their brands. Through the dissemination of research and the organisation of regular events, we aim to put digital on the agenda of every marketer in the UK, acting as an authoritative and objective source for all internet advertising issues.

About IMRG

IMRG (Interactive Media In Retail Group) is the industry body for global e-retail. Formed in 1990, IMRG is setting and maintaining pragmatic and robust e-Retail Standards to enable fast-track industry growth, and facilitates its community of members with practical help, information, tools, guidance and networking. The strength of IMRG is the collective and co-operative power of its members. www.imrg.org

Posted By | By Nicola Smith

The news that M&C Saatchi has acquired mobile marketing company Inside Mobile (nma 25 March 2010) is a milestone in a wider trend. As Ben Cusack, group creative director at Mobile Interactive Group, says, “If you look across all groups, they’re beginning to gather decent mobile vehicles. Aegis have got Marvellous, Publicis have got Phonevalley, WPP have got Icon. But this is the first time a traditional agency has taken notice of mobile.”

And there’s a growing realisation among brands that mobile is now an essential part of the marketing mix. Sienne Viet, head of mobile and social at Marks & Spencer, says, “When we started to integrate mobile, we knew we’d need to go to specialist agencies because we needed not just an agency that could deliver against a specific brief, but one (or more) that could work with us strategically, to help us brief in ideas properly, educate us and be proactive in suggesting approaches. This is just not possible currently with a traditional agency.”

quick facts

  • UK mobile ad revenue grew 99.2% between 2007 and 2008, according to the IAB
  • A number of large agencies have bought mobile specialists in the past three years
  • M&C Saatchi acquired Inside Mobile in March 2010, the first traditional UK ad agency to buy a mobile specialist
  • David Holecek, interactive marketing manager at Volvo, is concerned further acquisitions might mean mobile specialists in agencies are slower to adapt

With advertisers keen to ramp up mobile activities, further acquisitions among agencies are likely. Paul Berney, MD EMEA of the Mobile Marketing Association, says, “It’s all about traditional agencies realising they need to integrate mobile into what they’re doing, and it’s faster to buy a company than acquire skills from scratch.”

Charlie Carpenter, client services director at marketing intermediary Creative Brief, says the sense of urgency is rooted in experience. “Three or four years ago, when digital was taking off, agencies, and particularly ad agencies, were slow to bring in skills and capabilities, so they’ll be quite keen not to get caught short this time round. I’d expect to see more agencies moving to bring mobile capabilities in-house quite quickly, given that there seems to be a move in the market.”

Stefan Bardega, managing partner at MediaCom, a media agency that set up its own mobile division in 2008, believes there are two tiers of agency: those that invested two years ago, ahead of the curve, and those that are now faced with acquisition as their only option. “A lot of agencies are suddenly waking up and realising they have to get mobile capability, and because they don’t have a year to get that by training people up, they’re acquiring companies,” he says. “That’s is fine, but it is a more expensive way of getting those skills.”

Early buys

The jury is out on some of the first agency/mobile acquisitions that took place. Mobile agency Sponge was acquired by US mobile technology company NeoMedia in 2006 in an attempt to create the largest player in the mobile space, before being bought back by its management team six months later. Alex Meisl, chairman of Sponge, says, “Maybe some of the earlier acquisitions made one or two years ago haven’t always been successful, purely because agencies didn’t know what they were trying to acquire. They just thought they had to mobile so looked around for a mobile agency to buy.”

This wasn’t necessarily good for brands. Douglas McDonald, head of mobile at digital marketing agency TMW (and other Creston agencies) and former client services director at Sponge, warns that acquisition does mean an inevitable amount of “organisational inertia”. “The result in terms of proper integration of activity is probably going to take longer if you acquire because people have lots of other issues to deal with,” he says. “This will take away focus from what’s the best way to integrate mobile into a new campaign for Reebok, for example. Having been at a company that did get acquired, I can see that that definitely happens.”

Others believe further acquisition in this space is preferable to training people in the complexities of the mobile channel. Scott Seaborn, who joined Ogilvy two years ago as head of mobile technologies, acknowledges that adding mobile knowledge is a challenge. “You can’t teach people to do mobile easily. The only way to do it is to make mistakes. These mobile agencies have made all those mistakes over the past ten years. Acquisition of these specialists is brilliant for brands because their agencies can have full control over mobile production, and it gives the agency a lot more power to do better work.”

Luxury Swiss watchmaker Jaeger-LeCoultre chose Phonevalley, acquired by Publicis in 2008, to develop its iPhone app late last year. Phonevalley has worked closely with the brand’s media buying agency Zenithoptimedia, also owned by Publicis, to promote the app. “We can benefit from its international expertise,” says Gwenaelle Pourcelot, media assistant at Jaeger-LeCoultre. “And in the day-to-day work, we don’t feel the weight of the group because we’re working with a small team with strong expertise.” The app, a watchmaking school, had 140,000 downloads within two months.

While acquisition is arguably the most rapid route (on paper at least) to bring in mobile expertise, different approaches work for different companies. Both Creston and Ogilvy have taken a slightly evangelical approach. Creston hired McDonald, who has gently steered the digital team towards mobile. “These guys have a huge amount of digital expertise and mobile is part of digital, so they have 80% of the intellectual property and all the expertise to do mobile. They just need someone to help point out what the last 15% or so is,” he says, adding that the advantage of having his expertise in-house is that he can be involved in client meetings from the start.

“At Creston we’ve gone from doing no mobile to speak of to, in the last seven months, doing mobile for about 40% of our major clients,” McDonald says. “That’s because we integrated it into our proposal from the start.”

Ogilvy has also brought in an expert, Seaborn, to communicate the benefits of mobile, via big company meetings, presentations to account teams and the construction this month of a digital lab “full of funky hardware”, with partners including AdMob, Google, Nokia and Sponge. “As I got the teams more excited, that fed through to clients, then we got them in the lab and that started to generate briefs,” he says. Ogilvy has a network of 59 partners, from enablers to developers, giving it a very agile mobile workforce, and has won more than ten awards for its mobile work since Seaborn joined.

Total integration

MediaCom, meanwhile, has spent two years educating its 500-plus workforce on the benefits of mobile, and head of mobile Peter Fyfe has just joined the board of directors. “All areas of the business now have mobile capability,” says Bardega. “So the direct response team book mobile search campaigns, our display team do mobile banners and buttons. We’ve been through the pain barrier and now have mobile in every corner of the building.”

Mark Brill, chairman of the DMA Mobile Council, believes that “acquisition will be the next step in the development of the mobile advertising sector”. But is this all good news for brands? David Holecek, interactive marketing manager at Volvo, which works with independent mobile marketing company Mobiento, believes that in an ideal world the trend would ensure brand consistency and interactive integration. But there are potential problems. “The mobile space moves at light speed,” he says, “and there’s a clear risk that the larger, more traditional creative agencies won’t be able to adapt as quickly as they need to.”

But Dusan Hamlin, joint MD of Inside Mobile, remains confident. “We know mobile is a far more effective channel when planned as part of an integrated marketing approach,” he says. “The benefits of this far outweigh any risk, particularly when the partner agency understands the value of mobile within the marketing mix. For the few agencies like M&C that get this formula right, little can stand in the way of success for clients.”

URL Link:

http://www.nma.co.uk/features/acquiring-specialists/3013394.article

Sim Simeonov

Simeon Simeonov is co-founder and CTO of Better Advertising, a provider of online advertising compliance and assurance solutions. Sim is also founder of FastIgnite. Previously, he was a VC at Polaris Venture Partners and chief architect at Allaire/Macromedia (now Adobe). Sim blogs atblog.simeonov.com, tweets as @simeons.

“Notwithstanding anything else in this agreement, device data may not be provided or disclosed to a third party without Apple’s prior written consent. Accordingly, the use of third-party software in your application to collect and send device data to a third party for processing or analysis is expressly prohibited.”

This recent addition to Section 3.3.9 of Apple’s developers’ agreement appears to allow only Apple’s fledgling iAd service to identify, target and frequency cap ads in iPhone and iPod applications. No analytics, no frequency capping, no targeting of devices for advertisers that don’t send their money to Apple.

And If that wasn’t enough, changes to Section 3.3.1 disallowed Adobe (NSDQ: ADBE) Flash and any other non-native technologies in applications and, on April 29, in a lengthy open letter Steve Jobs outlined the timeline for including Flash in the Safari browser: never.

We in the ad developer community have all been talking about what was really behind Jobs’ screed against Adobe and Flash. While some of this might be attributable to the defense of Apple’s magical user experience, there is more to it than that. Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) is acting true to its DNA: trying to build a walled garden with a premium rich media advertising experience at an ultra-premium price. What’s new and should be concerning to the advertising industry is the attempt to put hurdles in front of other rich-media advertisers to access Apple users even through the browser, long deemed the one place where the platform vendor stepped aside and let the Web do its thing.

While blocking non-Apple-targeted advertising from applications and almost the entire unwashed Flash-based video advertising ecosystem, Apple is showing pretty iAd demos with interactive HD video ads, and its sales execs are sending out pitch decks claiming “exclusive integration with the App store,” and other benefits. With Flash out of the picture, Apple would face few real competitors for a premium advertising experience. This makes the timing of Apple’s move all the more important. The iAd platform is based on the Quattro Wireless acquisition Apple made earlier this year after its failed bid for AdMob, which is well-ahead of Quattro in market share. Regulatory bodies in Washington have thus far blocked Google’s acquisition, based, ironically enough, on anti-competitive concerns. Now the same regulators are expressing interest in Apple.

Everyone knows that iPhones and iPads are as much tiny entertainment centers as anything else. So, let’s consider the world of online video and interactive advertising without Flash. Online video advertising is hard to do well, which is the dirty little secret behind that segment’s slow rise. Online video players are complex software that offers branding, playback, targeted advertising, audience profiling and analytics, playlists, social sharing, etc., while integrating code, APIs and streams from multiple parties. Even with the help of IAB standards, it has taken years for these pieces to come together nicely on the Flash platform that is controlled by Adobe, which deeply values cross-platform development.

Given the early stage of HTML5 technologies, the likely differences in browser support for HTML5, the disagreements between major vendors over supported video formats, and the increasingly dynamic nature of the advertising value chain, it will be awhile before HTML5 video advertising solutions (and the ecosystem of vendors backing them) reach an equivalent level of capability and flexibility. While many vendors have HTML5 video streaming, advertising and analytics solutions in various stages of readiness, everyone I’ve talked to says they are not exactly sure how these separate pieces will fit together.

“Malvertising” will not go away in an HTML5-only world. Consumers will still be lured to click on ads that are too good to be true. Instead of hiding malicious code in Flash SWFs, the bad guys will put it in dynamically downloaded, minimized, obfuscated JavaScript files. Digital security is a constant battle between good and evil. Bad guys don’t have to go through a W3C or IAB standards process to do their deeds. They move quickly to exploit weaknesses. Response speed is very important in dealing with security issues online. Speed, however, is not something open standards efforts are good at. In fact, for all their other qualities, they are terrible at making good progress quickly because of the politicking behind the scenes.

On PCs and Macs there are third-party privacy and security browser add-ons, such as Ghostery, that innovate much more rapidly, but Safari on Apple’s devices is not open to extensions, so it is unlikely that iPhone and iPad users will have access to the same enhanced and up-to-date browser privacy and security features available on other systems. Browser Wars II may accelerate innovation and make everyone better off in the long run, but in the short run it means more cost and complexity for the advertising ecosystem and a bigger malware problem.

Apple has always done things its own way, with less regard for market share than for nurturing its brand and signature experience. This credo has kept Apple from becoming more like its competitors, even as its laptops run Intel (NSDQ: INTC) inside, and in recent years has made the company an enviable example to follow, pulling the rest of the mobile and PC industry forward. However, unlike in the past, Steve Jobs is not just running forward. Now, he’s taken the time to blow some of the bridges behind him.

URL Link:

http://paidcontent.org/article/419-steve-jobs-to-ad-industry-leave-the-premium-inventory-to-us/

My Comments on the below article:

M-commerce is a natural progression for retailers to extend their existing e-commerce operations.  I also have the viewpoint that m-commerce will leapfrog e-commerce in less established markets. After all mobile internet has done this in countries like India, China, Korea (to name a few) so why not m-commerce? Retailers have been traditionally slow in taking up mobile as a marketing/sales channel.  It was no different in the early fixed internet days. However, with players like Google and Apple moving into the market, I do believe Retailers are being forced to wake up and realise the true potential of this device.  Whilst they are behind other sectors in mobile adoption, it is not too late for them to get involved.

Unfortunately, we have already seen retailers start to embrace mobile with the wrong strategy and are making the mistakes that others are savvy too. We are seeing retailers jump on the app bandwagon without considering the mobile internet first, this is a classic mistake to make.

Mobile Internet is at the heart of Mobile Marketing campaigns. The key to this is to remember mobile works best when integrated into traditional media whatever the format.  Mobile applications are just one element to utilise as a marketing channel. At present only iphone applications are offering the rich levels brands would expect and the experience consumers would hope for. The others are some way behind.  There is limited reach, as in the UK iphone has only **17% handset penetration (much less Globally) with Blackberry slightly higher on **20% and Nokia still dominating with a huge **39%  (**Smart phone penetration).

In order to maximise the success of any campaign you need to reach the targeted masses; which means you need to consider all platforms and formats whether it is an application, mobile internet site or simple SMS communications or mobile vouchers (to name but a few). This always comes back to the key metrics in determining the success of any campaign:

Reach, Targeting, Engagement, Viral-ability and Transactional…..

Does it have reach?  Is it targeted? Is it engaging?  Is it viral? Can you make a sale?

The higher it scores in these areas then the closer you are to running a successful mobile marketing campaign that has delivered recognised measured tangible results.

The iPhone apps and other apps can be an added benefit to a customer base and must be considered.  Starting with the mobile internet will enable reach of a much wider audience and they can run trageted ad campaigns on mobile internet sites which will produce much better ROI than simply trying to drive traffic to download their iPhone app (which is not measurable and excluding to the masses if  integrated into traditional media). Only recently I published a press release on my blog from the IAB who conducted research with Nationwide showing  that using mobile and online advertising in combination can significantly increase brand awareness and purchase consideration:

http://wp.me/pxxzu-6R

I have been working in mobile with some of the worlds leading brands since early 2003 across many sectors.  Mobile is a powerful communications channel whether it is engendering loyalty, acquiring customers or retaining customers. It delivers in all these areas across all mobile formats.

Tweet this

Posted By, 26 February 2010 10:30am, Graham Charlton @ Econsultancy

One trend I’ve noticed lately is that the few UK retailers that have launched mobile commerce services have opted to do this via mobile apps rather than a mobile website. Both Next and Net-A-Porter have the app, but not the mobile site.

Is there an argument for producing an app rather than a mobile site? Or should retailers be looking to reach as many customers as possible with a mobile site? Or should they have both?

I’ve listed some of the arguments for and against…

Why have a mobile commerce app?

Since smartphones, and the iPhone in particular, currently dominate the mobile internet, there is an argument that an app is more likely to appeal to them.

Smartphone users are more affluent. Therefore, apps will appeal to an audience with more disposable income.

Better functionality. Smartphone features like GPS and the compass on the 3GS means that retailers can offer a richer experience, with location based services, augmented reality, or the photo function on the Amazon iPhone app.

Greater visibility. The popularity of App Store as a model for distributing apps means that retailers can get some good exposure for their apps. For example, the recently releasedNext iPhone app currently sits at number two in the Top 25 free apps list, which should guarantee plenty of downloads.

Your customers have smartphones. If you have a significant proportion of mobile visitors using Android phones and iPhones, then an app may be the best way to appeal to them.

Why have an m-commerce website?

Greater reach. An app restricts the number of customers you can appeal to.

Appeal to mobile searchers. Apps need to be downloaded in advance. If customers don’t have your app, they can’t buy from you, but if you have a mobile-optimised site, they can search and find it on their browsers.

No third party approval required. If you want an app, you’ll need to wait for approval before release and before you make adjustments. Having a mobile site means you are unrestrained in your site design and can push out updates and changes whenever you want.

No need to design multiple apps. Eventually other phones will eat into iPhone market share more and more, meaning that you may have to develop apps for several handsets. You can avoid this with a mobile site.

The browser-based mobile market is the future. According to recent Taptu research, the browser-based mobile web market will grow much faster than the app market, so a mobile site will be necessary long term.

—-

For a retailer looking for the largest possible audience for its products and services, the best starting point may be a website optimised for all mobiles, as this allows you to reach the widest possible audience. You allow people to stumble upon your site via a mobile search engine.

If a healthy percentage of visitors to your mobile site are using iPhones, Android Handsets or others, then there is a case for developing a dedicated mobile app to improve the experience for these customers.

Or, to cover all bases, why not have a mobile site AND app? This is what eBay, Amazon, Best Buy and others all do, and it seems to be working for them.

URL Link:

http://econsultancy.com/blog/5481-mobile-commerce-should-you-have-a-site-or-an-app#blog_comment_22997

My Comments on the below article:

I am late putting this up on my blog but finally had to do it, as the app versus mobile internet debate continues…

Mobile apps have seen huge growth throughout 2009, but are they the future for the mobile industry? Are they more important than mobile sites? These were the questions that an IAB debate earlier this week sought to answer.

Friday, 4 December 2009

The motion for the debate was “Mobile apps are more important than mobile sites”. Prior to the debate, a poll of the audience was taken with 58% opposing.

IAB mobile debate

Jon Mew, head of mobile at the IAB, introduced the proceedings by outlining some key statistics to highlight the popularity of iPhone apps in particular. Mew pointed out that there are now 115,000 iPhone apps for sale in the Apple app store and 2.4bn have been downloaded, meaning that more people have downloaded an app than own a TV.

Arguing for the motion were Amer Hasan, senior manager, apps and developer marketing, Vodafone; Chetan Damani, managing director of acrossair and Oliver Newton, head of emerging platforms at iLevel.

The team argued that the phenomenal growth of the iPhone showed that apps were the future for mobile. Citing figures from acrossair, they demonstrated that the iPhone is the fastest growing technology product ever.

Another key issue they sought to highlight was the enhanced experience offered by the iPhone. Fucntionality such as augmented reality made the iPhone experience far superior to traditional mobile sites it was argued.

Putting the case against the motion were Christian Louca, managing director of YOC; Clive Baker, managing director of Movement and Tim Hussain, head of mobile and video advertising at BSkyB.

This team sought to argue that reach is more important that experience. While they acknowledged that the growth of the iPhone is a hugely important development for the mobile market, they pointed out that only two per cent of the population currently have an iPhone.

The solution they offered therefore was not to cut off a huge percentage of your potential audience by only creating a mobile app, but instead to offer both an app and a traditional mobile website.

This argument seemed to sway the audience as, by the end of the debate when the final poll was taken, the percentage of attendees who opposed the motion had risen from 58 to 87.

Commenting on the debate, Jon Mew, head of mobile at the IAB, said: “The turn out and content from the debate showed what an interesting area apps are for brands. The debate centred around user experience versus reach, and the end result showed that the most important thing for brands is still being accessible to as many people as possible and providing the best experience they can.”

URL Link to IAB:

http://www.iabuk.net/en/1/thefutureofmobile041209.mxs

Below is a good analysis I came across on Gerson Lehrman Group website.  It was taken from an article published in the Guardian on the 9th November.
My opinion on this:
I do not entirely agree that focusing on the growth of the mobile web is wrong but I certainly do agree that just focusing on the growth of the mobile web is not the best approach in determining what is going to drive the growth of the mobile advertising industry.
I completely share the view point as commented below, quote ”will be driven by a deep understanding of the mobile consumer’s context not just by the mobile web”.   More understanding of the context of the consumer must be understood in order to produce concise relevant pieces of content that are specific to the needs demanded at any given time.  If we get this fundamental principle right then we will be on the right track and not follow the old footpath of online.  What do I mean by this?  I am not an online expert by all means but I am a heavy user of the web.  I see far too many ads that are so irrelevant to my needs.  This negative and at times somewhat quite annoying experience has now led to me conditioning myself to completely ignore ads on the fixed line web.  It is almost like they are not there.  We must not allow this to happen in mobile, especially if we are to maintain healthy CTRs and ROI for the advertisers.
For sure, we need much more growth in traffic, we need better developed ad-servers, we need better standardisation, we need richer devices, we need better understanding within the agencies and brand managers.  However, we must look beyond the all too easy areas where we can raise alarms bells.  Most importantly it comes down to the user experience.  If we get the user experience right, the advertisement will be embraced with open arms.  Showing the right message, at the right time, with relevant content in the preferred way will lead to the growth of the mobile advertising industry.   It is the people at the end of the device that will drive the growth.  Not the agencies, not the technology, not even the brands or the Googles.  It is me, you, your next door neighbour and every single one of us.  We don’t care if it is an iphone, Blackberry or Nokia.  We don’t care if it is a banner, text link or video pre-roll.  We buy into the experience. We prefer one experience over another experience.  If we get this right and place the message (in whatever format it comes) in this preferred environment then the results can be magic for everyone.
Article

Summary

Mobile advertising is set to soar but only if all mobile channels are used and the combination of enabling technology, analytics and advertiser mindset is focused on identifying the exact context of the consumer before ads are served.

Analyses are solely the work of the authors and have not been edited or endorsed by GLG.

Analysis

The article is taken from London based Guardian Newspaper in a special report, “Mobile Marketing” published on 9th November 2009. This was sponsored by The Internet Advisory Bureau (IAB), Velti and Orange. Other stories within the same report discussed the simplicity of texting, the appeal of mobile applications and the growing relevance of location awareness.

Even with all of the hype surrounding mobile advertising, it is starting from a relatively low base. The IAB reports 2008 UK spend on mobile advertising at just ₤28.6M, which itself represented a growth of 90% on the previous year. A 100% year-on-year growth is not too difficult to predict when 2009 figures are reported. Google’s recent acquisition of AdMob will certainly add to this rate of growth during 2010 as brands, advertisers and agencies leverage what is a huge endorsement of the mobile advertising industry.

That the project to determine an accurate method to measure mobile web traffic might somehow have a major impact on the industry is questionable. Whilst the GSMA working in collaboration with the UK’s big five operators to achieve this was the right way to go, the results are late. The GSMA are behind the curve on this after all, the lack of metrics has not stopped AdMob from serving billions of mobile ad impressions. Further more other specialist companies such as Bango for example, are already providing such tools.

But what about the rest of the advertising industry and their involvement in the mobile web?  For the brands, advertisers and agencies involved, focusing on the mobile web as the growth engine for mobile advertising is wrong. The tendency is still to treat the mobile web as a scaled down version of the internet. Mobile’s smaller screen and personal nature mean that it needs to be treated much more preciously that that. Ads served on the basis of what a consumer is browsing or what they are searching for will be hit-and-miss without tools that can accurately determine the context of the mobile consumers. Serving incorrectly targeted ads, even to consumers that have ‘opted-in’, will do much to damage brand values. The location, time of day and personal preferences of the consumer are key elements of that context and once it is available, there might be other more appropriate channels over which to advertise.  SMS, MMS, mobile video and mobile apps all support advertising.

Ultimately growth in mobile advertising will be rapid but it will come from being able to address consumers across any one of, or combination of all, the mobile channels available and will be driven by a deep understanding of the mobile consumer’s context not just by the mobile web.

URL Link to Gerson Lehrman Group website:

http://www.glgroup.com/News/Mobile-Advertising-Set-To-Soar—Yes-But-What-Is-The-Engine-For-Growth-44869.html

New research conducted by the Internet Advertising Bureau – the trade association for online and mobile advertising – found that 73% of marketers believe mobile will be the medium to see most growth over the next 5 years.

The survey, conducted amongst a panel of over 100 senior-level UK agency representatives, investigated their knowledge and understanding of mobile advertising, as well as general attitudes towards the medium.   The research also revealed that currently some 95% of digital budgets include spend on mobile, with only 5% of UK marketers not yet investing in the medium.

Familiarity and understanding of mobile increases

The results show that familiarity of many areas of mobile activity has grown significantly over the past 12 months, requiring respondents to ‘score’ their knowledge and understanding of the mobile medium. This has increased significantly over a 12-month period, with 42% of those surveyed rating themselves 6 out of 10 or above, rising from just 24% in 2008.

Awareness and understanding of areas such as MMS, voice and video shortcodes has grown, with just 20% of marketers having no experience in this area in 2009 compared to 66% in 2008.  Knowledge of mobile search is on the rise, with the amount of marketers with no experience of the discipline declining from 57% to 29% over the last 12 months.  Similarly familiarity of ads in and around mobile gaming has increased from 62% having no experience in 2008 yet only 35% had no experience in 2009.

Mobile specialism grows

The research also found that compared to 2008, the majority of employees responsible for planning a mobile campaign within the agencies surveyed are mobile specialists, with the number of dedicated mobile experts increasing year-on-year.  In 2008, around 37% of those responsible for planning mobile campaigns within agencies were dedicated specialists with this figure rising to just over half (52%) in 2009.

Bigger mobile budgets

Agencies that took part in the survey were also asked what percentage of their digital spend is for mobile, and the results reveal that some 95% of respondents included mobile in their overall digital budget.  Within this, 30% spent between 0 and 1%, 46% spent between 1 and 5%, 13% spent between 6 and 10% with a further 6% spending more than 11%.

Looking to the future, some 40% of agency respondents predicted they would be spending between 1 and 5% of their digital budgets on mobile in 2011.  A further 29% believed they would be spending between 6 – 10% and 13% stated they would be spending between 11 and 20% and just 1% of agencies stated that they will not be allocating any budget to mobile in the next 2 years.

Mobile to see the biggest growth

73% of those surveyed agreed that mobile will be the fastest growing media for the next 5 years, with a further 73% also believing that most media agencies will have a mobile specialist by 2010.  In terms of using the medium to communicate with specific audiences, some 55% of respondents agreed that in the future mobile will be the primary medium for communicating with 12 – 24 age group.

Jon Mew, head of mobile for the Internet Advertising Bureau said: “With the industry putting education at the very top of its agenda and driving growth more than ever this year, mobile advertising is less of a choice for brands, more of a necessity if they want to reach today’s consumer.  It’s extremely encouraging to see that agencies in the UK are adapting to the changing landscape allocating bigger budgets to mobile and hiring more specialists to plan mobile campaigns.

The IAB, alongside its expert members, will be continuing its efforts to put mobile at the forefront of the marketer’s agenda, familiarising them with the tools available and raising levels of understanding even further.”

URL Link to mobsessed.co.uk:

http://mobsessed.co.uk/2009/11/iab-95-of-digital-budgets-now-include-mobile/