Posts Tagged ‘ComScore’

Image representing comScore as depicted in Cru...

Image via CrunchBase

Posted By: ComScore

Spotlight on France Reveals Seasonal Growth in Tax, Car Rental, and Flowers Web Properties

London, UK, July 6, 2011 - comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR), a leader in measuring the digital world, today released an overview of Internet usage in Europe, showing 366.9 million unique visitors went online in May 2011 for an average of 24.2 hours per person. This study draws its data from comScore’s research panel, which measures Internet usage in 49 European markets aggregated under the European region and provides individual reporting on 18 markets. Among the reportable markets, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Turkey showed the highest average engagement with users from these markets spending an average of more than 30 hours online in the past month.

Overview of European Internet Usage by Country Ranked by Total Unique Visitors (000)
May 2011
Total Europe Audience, Age 15+, Home and Work Locations
Source: comScore Media Metrix
Location Total Unique Visitors (000) Average Hours per Visitor Average Pages per Visitor
World-Wide 1,373,976 23.9 2,161
Europe 366,862 26.8 2,752
Germany 49,993 24.1 2,638
Russian Federation 48,294 24.0 2,618
France 42,335 27.8 2,682
United Kingdom 36,660 33.9 3,079
Italy 23,210 18.3 1,762
Turkey 22,900 31.8 3,448
Spain 21,450 26.8 2,449
Poland 18,193 26.9 3,061
Netherlands 11,963 35.2 3,467
Sweden 6,161 25.0 2,423
Belgium 5,944 20.5 2,085
Austria 4,676 14.1 1,485
Switzerland 4,666 19.6 1,923
Portugal 4,146 21.5 2,034
Denmark 3,649 21.7 2,256
Finland 3,349 26.0 2,396
Norway 3,227 26.5 2,156
Ireland 2,079 21.5 1,953

Top Web Properties in Europe
Google Sites ranked as the top European web property in May with 333.4 million unique visitors (up 9 percent from a year ago), reaching 90.9 percent of the total European Internet audience. Microsoft Sites continued to rank second with 270.9 million visitors (73.8 percent reach), followed by Facebook.com in third place with 240.0 million visitors (65.4 percent reach). Among the top properties for May, the biggest gains versus April came from The Mozilla Organization (up 52 percent), WordPress (up 13 percent), and VKontakte (up 12 percent).

Europeans continued to spend significant time on social networking sites, with Russian social network VKontakte exhibiting the highest average engagement among the top 30 properties at 496.7 minutes (8.3 hours) on the site. Facebook.com overtook Russian web property Mail.ru Group in May with an average of 326.0 minutes (5.4 hours) spent by visitors on the property, up 15 percent from the prior month. Mail.ru Group visitors spent an average of 315.1 minutes (5.3 hours), up 7 percent. Facebook.com also continued to account for the highest number of page views at 139.8 billion in May (up 21 percent), representing 12.8 percent of all pages viewed in Europe during the month.

Top 30 Properties in Europe by Total Unique Visitors (000)
May 2011
Total Europe Audience, Age 15+, Home and Work Locations
Source: comScore Media Metrix
Properties Total Unique Visitors (000) Total Pages Viewed (MM) Average Minutes per Visitor
Total Internet : Total Audience 366,862 1,009,540 1,605.2
Google Sites 333,436 99,147 188.6
Microsoft Sites 270,859 27,218 193.0
Facebook.com 240,010 139,769 326.0
Wikimedia Foundation Sites 161,311 2,449 13.0
Yahoo! Sites 141,054 9,682 73.9
eBay 107,689 14,324 59.5
Amazon Sites 91,475 2,658 15.9
The Mozilla Organization 78,079 493 7.3
VEVO 77,670 774 11.8
Apple Inc. 69,872 514 4.8
Mail.ru Group 69,005 31,990 315.1
AOL, Inc. 64,278 1,664 28.5
Glam Media 63,892 937 11.5
Viacom Digital 56,952 537 10.4
Ask Network 56,945 526 4.1
Yandex Sites 55,720 7,817 64.7
Dailymotion.com 53,936 755 14.3
WordPress 52,269 430 5.3
VKontakte 52,123 38,151 496.7
CBS Interactive 51,950 538 8.9
Adobe Sites 48,473 229 3.3
Axel Springer AG 48,162 1,851 17.3
Orange Sites 41,138 4,609 62.0
NetShelter Technology Media 40,712 407 6.1
Deutsche Telekom 40,290 2,501 34.1
Technorati Media 39,621 206 3.1
Twitter.com 36,877 656 14.6
BBC Sites 34,962 1,440 34.0
Schibsted (Anuntis-Infojobs-20minutos) 34,259 5,068 77.2
Skype 33,817 139 51.0

Spotlight: Travel, Taxes, and Flowers Draw Visitation in France
In May 2011, a total of 47.4 million users in France (age 6+) went online, up 3 percent from the previous year. Users in France stayed an average of 1,571.8 minutes or 26.2 hours online in May, 2 hours more than the European average for the month and up 12 percent from May 2010. Google Sites ranked as the most visited property with 44.5 million unique visitors, followed by Microsoft Sites (40.8 million visitors), and Facebook.com (32.5 million visitors). Luxury retailer Groupe PPR, which attracted 18.2 million visitors, was the fastest gaining property with a 17-percent increase from a year ago.

Top Properties in France
Ranked by Total Unique Visitors (000)
May 2011
Total France, Age 6+, Home and Work Locations
Source: comScore Media Metrix
Properties Total Unique Visitors (000) % Reach Average Minutes per Visitor
Total Internet : Total Audience 47,374 100.0% 1,571.8
Google Sites 44,530 94.0% 175.9
Microsoft Sites 40,823 86.2% 245.9
Facebook.com 32,480 68.6% 308.8
Orange Sites 23,310 49.2% 99.8
Yahoo! Sites 22,070 46.6% 60.6
CCM-Benchmark 20,844 44.0% 10.5
Wikimedia Foundation Sites 20,656 43.6% 14.2
Iliad – Free.fr Sites 20,520 43.3% 22.0
Groupe Pages Jaunes 19,889 42.0% 13.9
Groupe PPR 18,181 38.4% 12.2

As there were a string of bank holidays in France in May, the fastest growing web category was Car Rental (up 69 percent from the previous month), driven by the growth in monthly visitation to Paris-based European rental car company property Europcar, Hertz.fr, and Priceline subsidiary eLocationdeVoitures.fr. In preparation for an annual income tax filing deadline at the end of May, properties in the Taxes category also saw an increase in visitation of 50 percent. Finally, as Mother’s Day approached for France, properties purveying flowers, presents, and e-cards in the Flowers/Gifts/Greetings category saw an increase of 43 percent.

Fastest Growing Categories in France*
Ranked by Percent Change in Total Unique Visitors (000) from April 2011
May 2011
Total France, Age 6+, Home and Work Locations
Source: comScore Media Metrix
Categories Total Unique Visitors (000) % Reach % Growth from April 2011
Total Internet : Total Audience 47,374 100.0% 0.1%
Car Rental 2,620 5.5% 68.8%
Taxes 633 1.3% 49.6%
Flowers/Gifts/Greetings 5,540 11.7% 43.2%
Humor 7,395 15.6% 38.4%
Health Care 2,426 5.1% 38.0%
Beauty/Fashion/Style 13,480 28.5% 36.6%
Lotto/Sweepstakes 8,498 17.9% 34.3%
Government 19,081 40.3% 33.2%
Information 6,545 13.8% 29.8%
Airlines 7,529 15.9% 28.7%

*Excludes Platform and ISP categories.

About comScore 
comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR) is a global leader in measuring the digital world and preferred source of digital marketing intelligence. For more information, please visit www.comscore.com/companyinfo.

Berit Block
comScore, Inc.
+ 44 (0) 203-111-1758
worldpress@comscore.com

Image representing comScore as depicted in Cru...

Image via CrunchBase

Posted by ] Patricio Robles

For many years, mobile has been the ‘next big thing’ for advertisers. And to be sure, the market for mobile ads has grown by leaps and bounds in dollar-terms.

The latest figure evidencing the growth of mobile as an advertising medium: according to comScore, the number of advertisers in the U.S. running mobile campaigns has grown exponentially in the past two years.

When comScore looked at Ad Metrix Mobile data for 600 of the mobile internet‘s properties in April, the number of advertisers was 689, an increase of more than 120% from two years ago.

Needless to say, if the market for mobile advertising to grow rapidly into the future, larger numbers of advertisers need to buy into the medium.

In theory, mobile will have a key role to play in most multichannel advertising strategies in the future, and the timing appears to be right now. Thanks in large part to the rise of smart phones and greater use of the mobile internet, advertisers are increasingly experimenting with mobile ads. And in many cases, they should be liking what they see.

According to a recent study, click through rates on mobile search ads are 2.7% higher on average than their desktop counterparts.

But there’s still a huge amount of room for growth. Right now, comScore says that the mobile content and publishing category accounts for 50% of mobile ads served, with consumer discretionary representing another 26%.

That means more than three-quarters of mobile ads cover just two categories. Lucrative categories, like financial services, aren’t as prominent — yet.

The key to continued growth of mobile advertising would appear to be continued smart phone ownership. According to comScore, smart phone users access their mobile browsers and mobile apps at much greater clips than their feature phone-owning counterparts, 82.3% and 85% to 19.1% and 15.9%, respectively.

Currently, 31% of mobile phone owners have a smart phone. But that number is increasing rapidly; last year, just 20% of mobile phone owners in the U.S. owned a smart phone.

The numbers make it clear: if the number of smart phone owners keeps going up, so too will the number of advertisers spending on mobile ads. In turn, publishers already active in mobile will see more opportunities to build ad revenue, and publishers not active in mobile will have greater incentives to develop a mobile strategy.

Via: http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/7623-number-of-mobile-advertisers-jumps-report?utm_medium=email&utm_source=topic

Posted By ] Henry Blodget

A few weeks ago, when Comscore’s mobile survey showed that Google’s Android smartphone platform had blown past BlackBerry and iPhone to dominate the US marketApple fans temporarily panicked.

Smartphone Market Share -- Phones Bought In Past 6 Months

It was the 1990s all over again!

But then Apple posted another monster quarter with great iPhone sales, and Apple fans rejoiced (and lambasted anyone who had murmured word one about Android.)

(How could Apple possibly be losing share, Apple fans roared. Apple’s US iPhone sales grew 155% year over year!)

Well, now the Nielsen numbers are out. And they show the same trend Comscore’s numbers did:

Android is gaining share by leaps and bounds, and iPhone share is dead in the water.

Specifically, Nielsen’s numbers suggest that, of all the smartphones sold in the US in the past six months, fully 50% were based on the Android platform.  Meanwhile, only 25% of buyers bought an iPhone, and only 15% bought a BlackBerry:

Smartphone Market Share -- Phones Bought In Past 6 Months

Now, these numbers extend back beyond February, when Apple started selling the iPhone through Verizon (which helps). And another Nielsen survey, of purchasing intent, suggests that going forward the sales may be more evenly split. So Apple looks poised to regain some share, at least relative to RIM and other also-rans.

Here’s the purchasing intent of those who expect to buy a smartphone over the next year. Last year, iPhone was the big winner. Now, by a small margin, it’s Android:

Smartphone Purchase Intent -- March 2011
As for current platform market share (phones in use), Nielsen’s numbers look very similar to Comscore: In March, Android had 37% of the US market, iPhone had 27%, and BlackBerry had 22%:

Smartphone Market Share -- March 2011

After the initial Comscore numbers came out, Apple fans also made the perfectly reasonable point that, if you’re assessing platform market share, you should also include iPod touches and perhaps even iPads when looking at Apple’s numbers.  And, certainly, if you include both of those, Apple’s overall share looks better.  But, globally, if you add up iPhones and iPod touches, Apple still lost share to Android year over year.

Why do Android’s gains matter? Can’t Apple just hold onto the “premium” segment of the market?

The Android gains matter because technology platform markets tend to standardize around a single dominant platform (see Windows in PCs, Facebook in social, Google in search). And the more dominant the platform becomes, the more valuable it becomes and the harder it becomes to dislodge. The network effect kicks in, and developers building products designed to work with the platform devote more and more of their energy to the platform. The reward for building and working with other platforms, meanwhile, drops, and gradually developers stop developing for them.

(This has not happened yet. Developers are certainly gearing up to develop for Android, but most say that they develop for the iPhone first. And Apple’s app distribution and payment mechanism is still far superior to Android’s. But lots more developers now develop for Android than they did two years ago.)

Importantly, it’s not a question of which platform is “better.” (This is irrelevant.) It’s a question of which platform everyone else uses.  And increasingly, in the smartphone market, barring a radical change in trend, that’s Android.

So that’s why Android’s gains matter. And, yes, Apple fans should be scared about them.

As we’ve said before, Apple is fighting a very similar war to the one it fought–and lost–in the 1990s. It is trying to build the best integrated products, hardware and software, and maintain complete control over the ecosystem around them. This end-to-end control makes it easier for Apple to build products that are “better,” but it makes it much harder for the company to compete against a software platform that is standard across many hardware manufacturers (Windows in the 1990s, Android now).

As we explain here, two important things are different about the current Android - iPhone battle as compared to the Mac – Windows war in the 1990s. First, Apple is maintaining price parity (or better) with the leading Android phones. (Macs were always priced higher than PCs). Second, Android is still a fragmented platform, which significantly reduces the benefits of “interoperability” across multiple manufacturers.

Google is working to fix the second problem, though–enacting much tighter rules about how Android can be used. And if the platform is to become dominant and ubiquitous, it will likely continue to tighten these rules.

And Apple’s price parity certainly does not appear to have stopped the Android juggernaut so far. And the reported delay in the release of the iPhone 5 until September won’t help.

See Also: Android Is Destroying Everyone, Especially RIM — iPhone’s Dead In The Water

Via: http://www.businessinsider.com/android-versus-iphone-smartphone-share-2011-4

Posted By Tomi T Ahonen ] Via http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/

This is the time of the year when we can do verification of many statistics, was it true what they said back then. I have good data now on SMS, MMS, Mobile Internet users and consumers of Mobile News.

The regular readers of this blog know that I have a passion for the numbers of the industry, the statistics. I load my books with them, I cram my presentations full of them and I quote stats in most any discussion I have about this industry. There are many reasons for my love of mobile industry statistics, but one of the biggest is that we have them. Those who know me from more than ten years ago, will remember the young Nokia executive who was peddling future stories about something we called 3G, and used utter promiseware and forecasts built on nothing but assumptions. After my career at Nokia, when I started my consultancy on October 1, 2001, there could be no stats for the new 3G industry, because literally that very same day the 3G industry was launched in Japan. I love the numbers of our industry so much, because way back then in the olden days, we didn’t have any numbers.

I have been desperate to find the ‘facts’ the stats the numbers and the proof, that this industry is and can be viable. As over the years the numbers started to appear, I have collected them feverishly, memorizing every detail and studying every variation. That passion eventually turned into an annual review of where the industry numbers are, at this blog. And two years ago, I turned that into the TomiAhonen Almanac, which is now an annual statistical publication and highly respected and widely quoted.

But with the numbers, I often get the question, where do the numbers come from. And I explain, the numbers in the Almanac are produced by my consulting company, TomiAhonen Consulting, as short-term forecasts, based on very many public data sources, with some TomiAhonen Consulting actual surveys, fortified with some data from my internal sources inside the industry. All of that goes into my big ‘black box’ ie my big model of the industry’s numbers and facts. There I have several proprietary formulae with which I generate the numbers. So for example I was the first person in the world to spot the multiple subscription (first discovered in Finland obviously) and have had more than 13 years of time to build, test and evolve my multiple subscription model to calculate out the multiple subscriptions from the total subscriber count of any country. When later tested against known (surveyed) results, my model has proven remarkably accurate. And so forth.

So in the current TomiAhonen Almanac 2010, I have over 80 tables and charts of mostly data that is not available in any public data source. And then inevitably one will want to know, how accurate is it. Tomi ‘claims’ that SMS had 3.6 Billion users worldwide, which was 78% of all mobile phone subscribers at the time. How can that be, when we see for example in the USA, that only 62% of Americans were using SMS at the same time. Is Tomi ‘exaggerating’ and how reliable are his numbers. Obviously, over time, we will get other, independent sources that report on many of the stats in my Almanac. Which of the stats get reported, I have no control over. But any one of them could potentially make me look ridiculous haha..

But for the mobile service user numbers, we have had several major analyst houses do international surveys over the past two years, which give us enough data to cover most if not all of the 25 largest countries on the planet. These 25 countries all have populations of (around) over 50 million up to China and India at 1.3 and 1.2 Billion respectively. Together thse 25 countries account for 5 billion people and 74% of the planet’s population. As it includes some of the most affluent countries like the USA, Japan, UK etc, and some of the poorest like Ethiopia, the Congo and Bangladesh, across the globe, it is a very good sample, from which we can fairly calculate a world average number for these statistics. Note that none of the analyst houses has bothered to go study each of these countries, but they can cover half a dozen or more, with usually regional focus areas. Specifically I am referring to public source information in press releases, white papers and news stories covering research by (in alphabetical order) Acision, Aenas, Asia Marketing Yearbook, Boston Consulting, ComScore, gfk, Informa, Jagtag, Nielsen, Ofcom, Pew, Research & Markets, TNS and Trak In. This data has then been supplemented with national regulator data, major operator data, and major domestic newspaper stories for those countries in those areas where these analysts had not covered that country or that service category. For the best case (SMS use) I had over 90% of the data points, for the worst case (News) I had 45%. I think these were enough that we can make very reliable nationally tested and relevant calculations of how many people are truly currently using these services. So lets go to the findings.

SMS HAD 79% USERS

For SMS I had written in the TomiAhonen Almanac 2010 that the end of year 2009 user level for SMS globally was 78%, ie 3.6 Billion. What kind of data points do we find? The USA is now up to 72%. Russia is at 80%, Germany at 88%, Italy 89%, the UK at 90%. Clearly my number is in that ballpark. There are lower numbers too. I was surprised to find that the latest finding from India says only 48% of the mobile phone subscribers in India use SMS, but this is probably due to the rapid expansion of mobile phones to those parts of the population who are not literate. Brazil was at 57% and Mexico at 68%. But Vietnam is at 90%, China at 93%. And so forth. So when we do all the math weighted by the size of each nation’s population, we arrive at an SMS user level of… 79%. First, wow that is as close as it can possibly be. Remember I said 78% at the start of the year, and this 79% is roughly from half-point in the year 2010 (the various studies were completed at different points in time, in most cases during 2010, some in 2009). I had been saying before, that the SMS user base grows roughly 2 percentage points annually, so this finding is also totally consistent with the number having been 78% at the start of the year!

And projecting it to 80% for end of year 2010, what would the SMS user base be today (when the world has 5.2 Billion mobile phone subscribers?) 4.16 Billion. If you round off that number, in round terms its 4.2 Billion. And you know what? ABI Research reported on December 29 of 2010, that by their calculations the world had …4.2 Billion users of SMS text messaging. It cannot get more precise than this haha. Can you trust my numbers? I think I know pretty well what I am doing haha. Now, lets go to the hidden success story of mobile, MMS.

MMS USERS 39%

One year ago, in the TomiAhonen Almanac 2010, I said that the active user base of MMS had reached 1.7 Billion people, which was 37% of all mobile phone subscribers at the time. Using the same process as the above, lets pick a few of the data points we find now from the surveys. In the USA, MMS is used by 54%. In China 49%. In Russia 36%. In Indonesia 25%. In Italy 42%. In Mexico 25%. In Turkey 26%. You get the picture. After all the math is done, the world’s average user base of MMS at roughly mid-point of the year 2010 was a bit more than my 37%, it was… 39%. I said the world had 1.7 Billion users, I should have said 1.8 Billion. If we add a bit of growth for the year, today the world has 40% of all mobile phone subscribers as active users of MMS, and that means 2.08 Billion people, lets call it 2.1 Billion. That is the measured, accurate MMS user base today. No wonder MMS revenues grew so heavily last year. And by the way, in the most advanced countries like say Norway, the MMS user number is now at 84%, but Norway is too small a country to count in my model. The real number is probably even higher than what the model now predicts (by a fraction of a percent..)

MOBILE BROWSING 26%

So then the contentious number. The reported stories about mobile browsing are all over the place. We see some famous analysts like Morgan Stanley say that the point of when more than half of all internet users access from mobile phones will happen in a couple of years from now, while others like IBM and Nokia saying the world has already passed that point, and today more people access the internet on a mobile phone than on a PC of any kind. One way to examine the absolute truth, is to count actual national internet user data, and see what percentage of it uses mobile phones. Using that method, I already confirmed that the mid-point had been passed in late 2009, that yes, today more people access internet content, or ‘surf’ or use browsing services on a mobile phone than on a PC worldwide. I am quick to add, that this includes WAP, the basic form of browsing which is not HTML traditional ‘real internet’ browsing but rather the more simplified and mobile-optimised ‘small screen’ mobile internet use, but nonetheless, if its Google on your phone or Yahoo or eBay or Facebook or Twitter, who cares if its on WAP or HTML web, its the familiar internet brand, and its delivered on a browser, on your phone. For those consumers they think they are surfing the ‘real’ internet if they Google on their phone and it gives them the result. But yes, to be clear, when I say ‘mobile browsing’ I do mean both ‘real internet’ browsing of HTML content like we’d do on our iPhones, or the more basic WAP use that many do, in particular in the Emerging World markets. Still, just looking at the 10 largest countries by internet users, 6 out of the 10 have already passed the point where more internet browsing comes from mobile phones than PCs, starting obviously with China, India, Russia, Japan etc.

Now, in my TomiAhonen Almanac 2010, I said that the user base of mobile browsing was 1.3 Billion people ie 28% of all mobile phone users. What does the survey tell us. Not quite that good. When we measure mobile phone users and how many use the mobile internet, we have countries like China 24%, USA 38%, France 37% and Germany 27%. Then there is Japan at 84% of course. But then we have countries Russia 12%, Pakistan 22%, India 10%, and Spain 20%. The math doesn’t come quite up to my percentage, rather than 28%, the survey result only confirms 26%. But that is still 1.2 Billion people -well more than the total installed base of personal computers in use in the world according to the latest ITU numbers. So my short term forecast seems to be a bit off on this.

But here, a very important point – these surveys are mostly consumer surveys, ie the companies like ComScore or TNS or Pew will ask the consumers what they are doing. So the consumer is asked for example ‘do you use SMS text messaging on your phone’ or ‘do you use the internet on your phone’. And here, there is confusion. I have heard from several of my colleagues, that measuring the mobile internet usage in consumer surveys will under-count the real usage. The consumers are confused on this question, because they feel the internet experience is used ‘on a PC, using a keyboard and mouse’ – but if the same consumer is asked for example, ‘do you use Facebook on your phone’ there will be many who say ‘yes’ to that, while saying ‘no’ in the same questionnaire if asked if they use the internet on the phone. I am not saying this as an ‘excuse’. I am saying this as my finding, that on this specific question, apparently, with ‘WAP’ and ‘Mobile Internet’ and ‘mobile browsing’ and ‘mobile web’ and whatever other possible permutations, the consumer can become very confused. A good market reserach instrument (the questionnaire) will attempt to correct for these types of errors, but they are likely to be in some of those findings.

What I will do, of course – numbers are my buddies – is to tell the truth of course – and to adjust my numbers downwards for the next TomiAhonen Almanac 2011, to reflect these findings. That is the very purpose of this process, that I always do at this time of year, I try to fine-tune and calibrate my model to be as accurate as it possibly can be, and there will invariably be small alterations I have to do to it across hundreds of data points. But for you the reader, I want to express the particular problem with this specific data point (which is not the problem with the three other data points we have here in this blog). And what kind of numbers do we now have for end-of-year 2010, if we use the 26% level for the full 5.2 Billion mobile phone subscribers? Try 1.35 Billion people who today are (definitely) using their phones to browse internet type of content. Wow. That is huge.

Remember, the total internet user base is 2 Billion now (said ITU a couple of weeks ago) and that 2 Billion number includes also those hundreds of millions who access the internet in internet cafe type of situations or libraries or at school or university. The world has only 538 households with a personal computer (ITU 2010). Then we have another about 370 million PCs used at work (many of these users will also have a PC at home so you cannot add the two numbers together). Clearly the mobile phone based internet access is far greater than PC-based access already today, but also, in the Industrialized World most of us who have a PC will also have a smartphone or premium featurephone that has a full HTML browser, so we can easily access internet services on both devices. Then as smartphones keep getting better, like the iPhone 4 for example, the stats now report that people are abandoning laptops and desktops and doing all their surfing on their smartphones. Not all users but the trend is away from legacy PC use. Japan saw this trend first, half a decade ago.

NEWS USERS ON MOBILE 23%

Finally we have consumption of news on the mobile phone. I see a lot of numbers on music use, ringing tones, listening to music etc, and on gaming downloads etc. Those numbers are so frequently reported over the years that my numbers are very well in line with the industry. But news is more obscure and for it we have just about enough data to make a good projection for world use. We find data points like 23% of mobile subscribers in China consume news, 30% in Japan, 35% in the Philippines, 32% in Thailand, 23% in the USA and 21% in Germany, but only 8% in Indonesia, and so forth. The calculated world average based on the sample, is 23%, which corresponded to 1.1 Billion users at mid-point in the year 2010. What did my TomiAhonen Almanac 2010 tell you a year ago? It said that at the start of the year the world had… 1.1 Billion people who consumed news on their phones. Is that accurate or what? Well, lets take this to the end-of-year numbers for 2010, so today the user number, assuming no growth in the percentage, is 1.2 Billion people. Bear in mind that the world circulation of newspapers, paid and free, is 480 million daily. 2.5x more people pay to consume news on a phone than on a newspaper. What of cable and satellite TV like our CNN, etc? The world has 950 million paid cable TV/satellite TV subscribers. So more people today pay to consume news on their phones than pay to see news on their TVs. Note, there is still free over-the-air TV, the world has 1.6 Billion TV sets – so mobile has still a couple of years to go to pass that for news, but for paid news, mobile is already the world’s most used paid newsmedium. Makes you think… No wonder CNN, the BBC and just about every major news organization is rushing to deploy mobile services.

NEW NUMBERS TO MEMORIZE

So we have big numbers. 4.2 Billion active users of SMS text messaging. Wow. The most used data application on the planet, by far. More than twice as many people send text messages on their phones, than use the internet on any device. More actve users of SMS than total number of FM radios in the world. Except for the population of mobile phones themselves, SMS is the second most widely-reaching medium and technology. And still growing strong. SMS added 600 million new users in the past 12 months, so it grew its user base by 17% in just one year! No matter what industry you are in, no matter what you want to achieve, you have to know SMS, its like what email was more than a decade ago, but turbo-charged, rocket-powered.

Then the much younger sibling of SMS, we have MMS, which has 2.1 Billion active users. Wow. Exactly half of all SMS users have also adopted the multimedia cousin of MMS. 2.1 Billion mobile phone users send and receive multimedia messages – pictures, videos, sounds and long-form texts, on their phones. Not only is it twice the number of personal computers in use in the world, but there are more active users of MMS than the total number of television sets worldwide, by a wide margin. The second most widely used data application, obviously (behind only SMS) whatever anyone ever thought they would want to use the computer for, whether to do newsletters or promotions or coupons or show videoclips or short music or recordings or pictures or paragraphs of text – far bigger than the reach on Facebook or Twitter or any social media, the first choice has to be MMS. How much did MMS grew its user base in the past 12 months of economic troubles in the world? try 24% ! Can you imagine something which had more users than the internet, or more users than total number of television sets – and then it grows by 24% in one year. In one year! At this rate, MMS would double in 3 years and 2 months from now. Is this a cool industry to be in, or what?

And the mobile internet (including WAP). It is now measured to be 1.3 Billion in size – and thus, out of the 2.0 Billion total internet users in the world (including PCs of any kind from desktops to laptops to tablet PCs like the iPad, at homes and at work; and PCs used at internet cafes; and mobile phone based internet access including HTML real internet on smartphones and featurephones, and the more simple and mobile phone optimised WAP browsing) – 65% use a mobile phone at least part of the time. There is absolutely no question, that the point of when ‘more people will use the internet on a phone’ – has passed. Years ago! 1.3 Billion people use a mobile phone to browse internet content, at least part of the time. The poorer the nation, the greater the proportion by which mobile leads, to the point where 90% of internet use in India is from mobile phones today, as the regulator from India reported last year.

Wow, 1.3 Billion mobile phone users, 26% of us all, already surf the web on our phones. That number is bigger than the total number of fixed landline phones globally. Not that there are more internet users than fixed landline phones, but that there are more people who use the internet on a mobile phone – than total fixed landline phones (many who are now no longer used for voice calls and only used for the home internet access, what an irony, even this cannot save the fixed landline).

Or compare that to the maxiumum accessable market size for those famed ‘App Store’ applications. If we take all existing smartphones in use – about 750 million today, and of those we use the brand new statistic we heard today that 71% of the smartphone users actually install apps onto their smartphones – the accessable market size for an ‘apps strategy’ would be 530 million. Mobile web users are more than twice as big as that market. And that market is half Symbian, Nokia’s OS. Blackberry is the second most used platform, iPhone only has less than 100 million iPhones in its total active installed base. So you could launch an iPhone app today, or if you went for the WAP/web version on a phone – it would cost you only 1/10th the cost to develop and you’d reach an active user base that is 13 times bigger. Now what was the smart strategy, again?

And we have now measured that it is true, 1.1 Billion people – 23% of mobile phone owners, receive news on their mobile phones. More than the total paid subscribers of cable TV and satellite TV who have access to 24 hour news like CNN, Sky, BBC, etc and more than twice the total circulation of all daily newspapers, free and paid. The newsmedium which has most paid users is now.. mobile! Cool. Oh, and what is the most-used format for news consumption on the phones? Its SMS of course. What is the second-most used? You guessed it, MMS of course.

4.2 Billion is SMS users, 2.1 Billion is MMS users, 1.3 Billion is mobile browsing/mobile internet users and 1.1 Billion is consumers of mobile news. Big numbers indeed.

There you go. We have some measured data on major mobile user stats. And the TomiAhonen Almanac is proving a very accurate source indeed. Now, for those readers who don’t have the Almanac, it only costs 9.99 Euros and I have a special treat for you newcomers. If you buy the TomiAhonen Almanac 2010 now, during January 2011, you will receive it instantly of course, and then you will also receive, for no further cost, the TomiAhonen Almanac 2011 edition as well, that will be released in February (for which I am obviously right now calculating and researching the data. There will again be new data in several cool new charts and tables that was not in the previous Almanac). Isn’t that a fair deal? If you ever wanted to know all the data, facts and stats about the mobile industry, now is your chance. For more info including several sample pages with full un-obscured charts and tables, see TomiAhonen Almanac 2010.

Via: http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/

Posted By, by Kunur Patel

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) — With the iPhone, Apple changed the face of mobile devices. Can it do the same for mobile advertising?

CEO Steve Jobs is reported to have said, “Mobile ads suck,” and in the wake of its purchase of mobile ad network Quattro, all signs point to Apple exerting its considerable clout on the mobile web to make the ads, well, better. “Static banners aren’t very Apple,” said Krishna Subramanian, co-founder of mobile ad exchange Mobclix.

But one question is reverberating around the industry: Will Apple use its dominance to squeeze out other so-called premium ad providers?

Taking control
Last week Apple showed it won’t be shy about setting new standards. In a blog post, the company warned developers that it will reject apps that serve users location-targeted ads. “If your app uses location-based information primarily to enable mobile advertisers to deliver targeted ads based on a user’s location, your app will be returned to you by the App Store Review Team for modification before it can be posted to the App Store,” the post said.

Tweet this

Location-based ads are often the most attractive for advertisers looking to drive foot traffic into stores. “If I’m looking at my phone, I want to see an ad for the restaurant around the corner, not for something without context,” said Michael Becker, Mobile Marketing Association’s managing director, North America. “Situational relevance for mobile users — and for marketers — is essential.”

Apple claims the controversial post was only intended to protect user experience. Regardless, to some, this move looks like a preview of what Apple has planned for its new ad network. It has been building out a global sales team, and Quattro CEO Andy Miller is Apple’s first VP-mobile advertising, reporting directly to Mr. Jobs. It’s the first time Apple has been in the ad business, and this move indicates how seriously the Cupertino, Calif.-based company takes it.

“Clearly, Apple is going to do everything it can to redefine mobile advertising,” said Eric Litman, chairman-CEO of ad network Medialets, who also said he sees merit in Apple’s defense of users in its location-based ad restriction. “Obviously they’re going to want to leverage unique capabilities of their device as an advantage to them and not their competitors.”

Restricting competition?
How would that happen? Since all applications must go through a stringent approval process before hitting the App Store, Apple could reject apps with non-Quattro ad network code. But restricting outside ad networks would also mean cutting into developers’ profits, because many already partner with multiple networks to monetize their apps.

It is also likely that Apple will integrate Quattro into its software development kit, giving developers a default ad network that’s built into the app toolbox. With an already embedded ad network, developers would have an automatic revenue stream on approved apps, and would then have to contract networks beyond, or instead of, Quattro.

The iPhone claims about 25% U.S. smartphone market share as of December, according to ComScore. An Apple spokeswoman declined to speak directly about plans for Quattro or Apple’s position on mobile advertising.

Apple has cast the deal as a way to make money for the developers whose apps have made the iPhone popular. Right now, Apple reaps 30% from music and paid app downloads and, like the existing mobile ad network model, could take a fee for passing ad sales on to developers.

Redefining mobile ads
Developers could also stand to benefit from Apple meddling in mobile ad formats — better ads could mean better results, happier clients and, eventually, more money. With Apple’s characteristic design and usability expertise, it could reinvigorate the ad category so mobile doesn’t get stuck in the same banner doldrums as its interactive predecessor, online advertising.

“There’s no doubt that Apple will add functionality around advertising,” said Mike Sanford, president-CEO FlipSide 5, a developer whose apps, including Touch Hockey, have been downloaded 26 million times.

Mr. Sanford said the current purchasing experience on iPhones is clunky. But with a mobile ad network backed up to the phone’s operating system and the almighty iTunes, Apple could work some of those kinks could out. Imagine ads that click-to-buy to iTunes, a purchase platform consumers already use and trust with their credit card information.

“People might be hesitant to tap credit card information into their phone,” said Mobclix co-founder Sunil Verma, citing the ESPN’s app. “But they’re already used to buying games on iTunes.”

URL Link: http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=142036

Posted By, Eden Zoller @ Ovum

The GSMA, in partnership with ComScore, has released the first cut of what it hopes will become industry-standard metrics for mobile advertising. The metrics are based on anonymised browsing data gathered from all five UK operators’ subscriber bases. These behavioural metrics are complemented by some basic demographic data collected on an opt-in basis from a small panel of mobile users. The mobile metrics are currently confined to the UK, but there are plans to expand to other markets. The GSMA mobile metrics are a modest but much-needed first step and should be welcomed as they address one of the key factors that has slowed mobile advertising: the lack of standardised metrics for measuring audience engagement.

Tweet this

The lack of a transparent, commercial framework has slowed growth

Mobile advertising has been with us for a decade but has yet to generate significant revenues. This is despite the fact that mobile as a channel has a lot to offer (rich user data, fine-tuned targeting, personalisation and interactivity, to name a few) and brands and agencies are without doubt interested. But for most brands outside the ranks of Coca Cola and Unilever, mobile advertising is still not an automatic part of their budget. A major reason for this is because the mobile advertising market has been very slow to create a well-defined commercial framework, which has resulted in a fragmented market and has made it harder for brands to do business. A cornerstone of this commercial framework is standardised metrics, and unlike print publishing, Internet and TV, there have been no widely established metrics in place for mobile advertising. This makes it a risky proposition for advertisers, which basically lack the tools they need to learn about user behaviour and measure audience engagement – both important elements in making the case for a clear ROI.

Foundations for a more robust mobile advertising market

ComScore collates the data on behalf of the GSMA and provides it to the advertising community along with associated tools. The data is independently verified by auditors ABC Electronics. The GSMA has been laying the foundations for the mobile metrics for the past 18 months. This includes looking at security and technical issues, as well as working with regulatory authorities and other industry bodies such as the Mobile Marketing Association and Internet Advertising Bureau to ensure a coherent approach.

The behavioural insights provided by the current metrics include the number of unique visitors, the number of page impressions and time spent on any given site. Additional features include the ability to filter by device features and a directory classification of sites (such as social media, travel or sport).

There are of course still gaps in the data, and the GSMA intends to address these with what appears to be a well thought through road map. For example, it intends to expand the metrics to other formats such as video, messaging, search and applications. Another objective is to expand the demographics, which are currently based on a small panel in the thousands. It will also work with market research firm TGI to incorporate the mobile metrics into a broader media mix. Alongside this is a commitment to roll out the metrics across other operators and geographies outside the UK – the GSMA is already in talks about this.

The GSMA has the goodwill of the industry behind it, and has created foundations that should see the metrics develop into a standardised tool with global reach. This will not in itself cause massive overnight growth in mobile advertising, but it should instil more confidence and hopefully persuade so far unconvinced advertisers that mobile advertising has finally come of age.

URL Link: http://www.ovum.com/news/euronews.asp?id=8372

My opinion on the below article:

I personally do not see a shift back to SMS advertising.  Working with one of the largest open mobile networks across Europe we see a huge increase in display and text link based advertising.  They work and work well.  Currently, SMS advertising can cost far too much.  CTR’s on SMS advertising generally are much less than display or text links.  SMS can cost an advertiser up to £200 CPM, whereas display and text links will vary from much lower CPM’s or CPC’s.  Whilst with SMS you can get reach that a branding campaign will demand, the majority of campaigns in the UK market this year have been DR.  Moving forward, I believe Network Operators will need to focus on more integrated campaigns across all mobile properties like: Display, Text Links, Video Pre & Post, Idle Screen, Voice Messages, SMS, MMS, Customer Service Messages and so on.

I believe agencies find mobile advertising a challenge because they are learning it is never just about selling an ad spot. Mobile advertising often forms part of a wider mobile marketing strategy tied in with CRM, Customer Acquisition and Engendering Loyalty.  In addition, it often forms part of a campaign that is integrated into traditional media which again presents further hurdles.  Therefore, when brands want and need to understand the entire spectrum and not just the advertising element many agencies struggle.    We can keep blaming lack of clarity on where the buying points are and lack of ad-serving capabilities and reporting but I think this is a weak argument.  All growing industries will have these kind of challenges.  The key should be more focused on how we can work better together, understand each others skills and how this can transform into combined positive output to the client.

To summarize, Mobile is so different to traditional media.  Historically speaking, it has always been ‘ONE FORMAT’ Print, Radio, TV or online.  Mobile is a whole world of different formats from one device to the next few thousand, all with different capabilities and don’t forget the users all come with different mindsets.  It requires specialist knowledge to effectively utilize this channel and understand the dynamics.  This is not knowledge that can be shared overnight and will take time for all to learn.

Whilst I agree it has been tough year from a recession perspective I would argue that mobile marketing and advertising budgets have grown and not been cut.  Well this is certainly what we are experiencing having a record year in the UK. As mobile budgets traditionally have been so small brands cut the bigger budgets in TV, Print, Radio and Online. If anything mobile budgets have grown this year and I certainly would anticipate huge growth in 2009 from 2008.

This is not going to happen over night.  Online took a good part of 11 years.

by Global Telecoms Business

Mobile operators have extensive data about their customers, so why aren’t they earning more revenue from advertising? The market seems as far away as ever, according to key participants in the business


Jay Seaton of Airwide: Trying to force-fit ads to
thousands of different handsets is an issue


Mike Short of Telefónica: Mobile advertising is
going to have to have a debate about reach and
responsibility


John Rands of WIN: Sometimes an agency puts
together a campaign and will do mobile as well


Neil Wentworth of mCentric: Brands are in the
dark. They have no idea how to access people by mobile

Why has mobile advertising not had the stunning success that many have been forecasting for so long? For years the mobile industry has looked for ways to earn revenue by targeting its users with advertising — and there has even been a whole operator, Blyk, which wanted to cut call costs to zero if its customers simply checked a few ads every day.

But little has been achieved, even with smartphones that could, in theory, deliver high-quality content to phone users.

Indeed, says Nick Lane, chief analyst at research company MobileSquared, where operators are achieving anything it’s via the 15-year-old technology of SMS. “We spoke to 30-35 operators around the world,” says Lane. “Just over 60% said they used SMS messaging as the foundation for next generation messages. A lot of agencies are going back to SMS. There’s a shift away from what people were saying 12 months ago.”

James Tagg, head of mobile at ad agency Starcom MediaVest, agrees: “It’s been a very tough world for mobile advertising this year,” he says. The recession means advertising budgets have been cut around the world “and mobile was the first to be cut — massively”.

One of the reasons is that mobile advertising still earns small revenues for agencies, which employ few specialists in the medium. “Some have only two people covering mobile, compared with 30 for print advertising. There’s only so much those people can do until the money is there. We’re not losing money but we’re not making huge money.”

And behind that, “most clients don’t really understand mobile”, he adds. Now’s the time to remedy that, he says: begin to adjust now “and you’ll be in a lot better position in two years”.

One of the key problems is a lack of information on which to make decisions, says Stewart Goldberg, executive chairman of Business Logic System. “The operators don’t have the same demographics about their base that the TV companies have.”

Mike Short, vice president of Telefónica Europe disagrees: “Some of the demographics that we have is a lot better — but it’s in a different format.” The mobile industry is working via the GSM Association and mobile marketing analyst ComScore to remedy that. “We can do age, location and subject,” he says.

Lane is not convinced: “Traditional advertising is very visible,” he says. And potential advertisers can easily get information about how much it costs to advertise. “If you want a rate card [for mobile advertising] you have to go down a long dark tunnel and sign a non-disclosure agreement.”

There is widespread ignorance among potential advertisers, says Neil Wentworth, director of sales at mCentric, which runs a service delivery platform for the industry. “Brands are in the dark. They have no idea how to access people by mobile,” he says.

It is starting to shift in agencies, says Alistair Hill, a senior analyst ComScore. Its work with the GSMA is aimed at “simplifying the process of buying”, so that agencies can see metrics that allow them to compare different types of advertising — including mobile with conventional, if that is the term, online.

Mobile is too often an addition to an existing ad budget, complains John Rands, managing director of WIN, which describes itself as “a dynamic enabler of entertainment, information and interaction services”. Sometimes a brand or an agency puts together a campaign “and will do mobile as well”, he says: “It’s the ‘as well’, and that might mean just putting a text number in the corner.”

It’s better in some countries, says Goldberg. “In south-east Asia and Australia there are millions of transactions executed using two-way text.”

Simeon Coney, vice president of business development at Adaptive Mobile, adds that in South Africa mobile advertising is starting to dominate, because of an underdeveloped traditional media business.

Many customers see mobile advertising messages as spam. “What’s considered as spam is personal,” says Jay Seaton, chief marketing officer of Airwide.

Coney believes the industry has to be careful, as governments might impose rules about what can and can’t be sent. “Governments will be putting the onus on operators,” he warns. “It will be a real challenge to the industry.”

Short says: “We’d rather have a simple set of rules. Mobile advertising is going to have to have a debate about reach and responsibility.” Child protection and parental controls will have to feature in that debate, he adds. “It’s now getting to ministerial level.”

According to Hill of ComScore, mobile advertising is still some way behind online advertising. “Everything on the internet has become contextual,” he says.

Lane also believes that the parallels with PC-based advertising should not be ignored: “All we’re doing on the mobile is browsing: email and social networking, and news, sport and weather.”

Goldberg, who has just had to extend his daughter’s mobile package to 1,000 texts a month, says: “We should have 11-year-olds on the boards of our companies.” Though Hill retorts that “the average age of the mobile media user is 35”.

Gather any group of enthusiasts for mobile advertising together — and this group was at an event hosted by Airwide — and you’ll soon hear stories about mobile advertising successes.

Unfortunately, most of these stories date from those optimistic times before the recession: such as BMW sending its car customers in Germany localised weather warnings by MMS, complete with a picture of each customer’s car in the right colour.

In theory, the industry has the data that could be enormously useful to advertisers — but Short points out that one of the problems is the sheer volume of it.

Goldberg sympathises: “The amount of data on the network is huge — 120 million transactions a day.” That’s the figure for the UK. “You’d need data warehousing the size of small countries. Operators have the data, but extracting the data is a non-trivial exercise. It just can’t be done in real time.”

Short emphasises the scale of the challenge: “We know the location of 50 billion text messages a year,” he says.

But operators haven’t explored new opportunities, suggests Goldberg. They would know the identity of 150,000 people attending a grand prix or other sports event, he notes. There’s potential there to use information to send them messages.

Mobile advertising, in theory, is a lot more economical than television advertising — which reaches many more people than could possibly be interested in a deal. With mobile, “you offer a deal only to people to want to offer the deal to”, he says.

One of the problems is that there is an advanced market for advertising in developed countries, says Seaton. “In developed markets there’s not such a need to innovate.”

Smartphones, if anything, make life for mobile advertisers complicated — simply because there are so many, built with different standards. “The market’s evolving quickly, with lots of new handsets,” says Tagg.

Seaton notes that this is why in some markets advertisers have relied on the simple technology of text messaging. “Trying to force-fit ads to thousands of different handsets is an issue. That’s why we’ll be having the same advertising discussions in two years.”

Goldberg returns to the theme that the industry is ill-informed about mobile advertising: “Operators and suppliers need to educate agencies and brands,” he says. “Many just don’t know what you can do.” That, he adds, is “why text is so good” — advertisers do understand that.

So how should the market move? “It’s up to the operators to expose their assets,” says Seaton. “There will be thousands of opportunities. Application developers can leverage all the assets, not just the 15% of smartphones.”

But Lane concludes with a sceptical note: “There’s hardly any money in mobile advertising and it dominates all our conversations,” he concludes. GTB

URL Link to Global Telecoms Business:

http://www.globaltelecomsbusiness.com/Article/2346535/Operators-still-waiting-for-ad-revenue.html